Shop More Submit  Join Login
×




Details

Submitted on
April 23, 2010
Image Size
112 KB
Resolution
971×423
Thumb

Stats

Views
8,783 (1 today)
Favourites
157 (who?)
Comments
65
Downloads
2,917

License

Creative Commons License
Some rights reserved. This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 License.
×
Grenade Gatling Gun by c-force Grenade Gatling Gun by c-force
An idea made with the help of good ol' PMP.

A few months ago. I had this thought which goes:
"What if a Mk. 19 40mm Grenade Launcher had a kid with a gatling gun?"

This would be a result of that thought. A gatling gun that fires 40mm Grenade shells.
Add a Comment:
 
:icondynamo-clan:
Dynamo-Clan Featured By Owner Aug 9, 2014
I need to say, it's an good Idea, but, the feeding system is horrible, sorry, the belt is an disintegrating one, so there is no need to an chamber, and that one is a bit small for an fucking 40mm grenade.
Reply
:iconbladewolves:
BladeWolves Featured By Owner Aug 2, 2014
"Why does this thing exist? because screw you and everyone around you"
GJ btw...
Reply
:iconvatrou:
VATROU Featured By Owner Jul 15, 2014
Practical probably not.But who needs that, it's a freaking Grenade Gatling! Just remove any nay sayers with extreme prejudice.  
Reply
:icongeoffrox24:
GeoffRox24 Featured By Owner Jul 4, 2014  Hobbyist General Artist
NOOB TUBE!
Reply
:iconarsenal6:
arsenal6 Featured By Owner Sep 3, 2013
Wouldn't that be GAU 30mm Gatling cannon. I believe the shells on that are the same as that of the grenade shell. THey come in two types Armour peircing and high explosives. Also I want to bring your attenstion there is a German WW2 artillery Railway Gun Gustav . It fires 30inch shell. No imagine a 30 inch Gatling cannon same as the 30mm used on the A-10 Warthog. I wonder what the size it will be .
Reply
:icongothexplorer:
Gothexplorer Featured By Owner May 30, 2013
This weapon looks like it could turn any battlefield into a sea of fire in just a few seconds.
Reply
:iconelverlentsch:
Elverlentsch Featured By Owner Feb 18, 2013
wow! too big and too heavy for good mobility on the battlefield on foot and far too large munitons wastage at a fire rate of 500-1200.per minutes and semi automatic is better and lighter and less noticeable on the battlefield ..
and the fire prätzison suffers not as hard hit by the high fire rate of the weapon
Reply
:iconcnr4806:
CNR4806 Featured By Owner Aug 8, 2013
More-dakka style weapons are well-known for their psychological effects, which DOES justify the massive consumption of ammo if your country has sufficient resources to resupply them.

Here's a few examples that are inefficient by ammo-consumption-to-kill ratio, but horribly efficient at terrifying soldiers in their era:
1. Maxim machine gun (Changed warfare forever)
2. MG42 (You will NOT like to hear the sound of this thing unless you're on Hitler's side)
3. M134 Minigun (Greatest waste of ammo of the era... not so much when you take the Oh Crap reaction of your enemy into account)
Reply
:iconagacora:
Agacora Featured By Owner Dec 8, 2012  Student Digital Artist
Those zombies wouldn't know what hit 'em!
Reply
:iconc-force:
c-force Featured By Owner Dec 14, 2012  Hobbyist General Artist
What zombies? All I see is rotten body parts everywhere. (j/k)
Reply
Add a Comment: